Saturday, September 22

AIOU Solved Assignment (Spring 2018): Management Strategies in Educational Institutions (8615): Assignment No.2

Q. 1 Explain Behavioral Systems Analysis (BSA) in your own words. Suppose you are working in an educational institution, and found that the interaction between the teachers and administration is poor leading to poor performance of the institution. Give concrete suggestions to improve individual and system performance. 

Answer: 



Behavioral systems analysis (BSA), or performance systems analysis, applies behavior analysis and systems analysis to human performance in organizations. BSA is directly related to performance management and organizational behavior management. 
Behavioral systems analysis is an approach to organizational design and management. It is based on the premise that organizations are complex systems. As such, changes in one aspect of performance in an organization necessarily affects performance in another parts of an organization. A primary goal of BSA is to create a balanced applications in which areas of poor performance are improved, areas of high performance are maintained, and employee performance outcomes are directed towards organizational goals. This is done through the careful use of behavioral and systems theories, and the application of research based principles of behavior, such as reinforcement, punishment, stimulus control, discrimination and generalization. 

Tools 

Here is a list of some the tools and the last name of the author next to them: 
  • Behavioral Systems Engineering Model – M. Malott-2003 
  • Total Performance System – Brethower-1982 
  • Super System/Relationship Map – Rummler-1995 
  • Is/Should Process Maps/Task Analysis – Rummler, M. Malott 
  • ABC (PIC/NIC) Analysis – Daniels 
  • Behavior Engineering Model/6boxes/Performance Diagnostic Checklist – Gilbert, Binder, Austin-2000 
  • Human Performance System – Rummler 
  • Performance Planned and Managed System/Interlocking Contingencies at Various Management Levels/Cultural Change Model – Rummler, M. Malott, R. Malott 
Behavior Analysis is a scientific discipline that studies the behavior of individuals. Behavior Analysis maintains that behavior is the product of individual's interaction with his or her environment (e.g., physical environment, social environment, genetic environment) and the history of that interaction. All social organizations are comprised of individuals' behaviors and their products. Systems Analysis is a scientific discipline that studies the operations of complex systems such as organizations, and focuses on the interactions between parts of those systems. A system can be understood as interrelated components or parts that interact toward a common purpose. Accordingly, the behavior or functioning of one part or parts affect(s) the behavior or functioning of other parts. In systems analysis, a system is not considered to be reducible to its parts. Therefore, the parts can only be understood in terms of their interaction with other parts of the system. 
Behavioral Systems Analysis draws upon basic and applied research on behavior and the research and practice in Organizational Behavior Management, Performance Management and Systems Analysis. Behavioral Systems Analysis views organizational performance as a scientific subject matter. From this perspective, an individual's behavior in organizations is a naturally occurring phenomenon. Moreover, the discovery orderly relations between behavior and the system in which it occurs gives us opportunities for Behavioral Systems Applications to improve individual and system performance. 
Behavioral Systems Analysis is an approach to organizational design and management. It is based on the premise that organizations are complex systems. As such, changes in one aspect of performance in an organization necessarily affects performance in another parts of an organization. A primary goal of BSA is to create a balanced applications in which areas of poor performance are improved, areas of high performance are maintained, and 3 employee performance outcomes are directed towards organizational goals. This is done through the careful use of behavioral and systems theories, and the application of research based principles of behavior, such as reinforcement, punishment, stimulus control, discrimination and generalization. 

{================}

Please Check Solutions to Other B. ed Assignments (Spring 2018)

Q. 2 Define ‘Total Quality Management’. Discus ‘Leadership’ and ‘Engagement of People’ as principles of quality management in education sector. 

Answer: 

Total quality management (TQM) consists of organization-wide efforts to install and make a permanent climate in which an organization continuously improves its ability to deliver high-quality products and services to customers. While there is no widely agreed-upon approach, TQM efforts typically draw heavily on the previously developed tools and techniques of quality control. TQM enjoyed widespread attention during the late 1980s and early 1990s before being overshadowed by ISO 9000, Lean manufacturing, and Six Sigma. 
Total Quality Management (TQM) describes a management approach to long-term success through customer satisfaction. In a TQM effort, all members of an organization participate in improving processes, products, services, and the culture in which they work. 
Total Quality Management Principles: The 8 Primary Elements of TQM 
Total quality management can be summarized as a management system for a customerfocused organization that involves all employees in continual improvement. It uses strategy, data, and effective communications to integrate the quality discipline into the culture and activities of the organization. Many of these concepts are present in modern Quality Management Systems, the successor to TQM. Here are the 8 principles of total quality management: 

1. Customer-focused 

The customer ultimately determines the level of quality. No matter what an organization does to foster quality improvement—training employees, integrating quality into the design 4 process, upgrading computers or software, or buying new measuring tools—the customer determines whether the efforts were worthwhile. 

2. Total employee involvement 

All employees participate in working toward common goals. Total employee commitment can only be obtained after fear has been driven from the workplace, when empowerment has occurred, and management has provided the proper environment. High-performance work systems integrate continuous improvement efforts with normal business operations. Self-managed work teams are one form of empowerment. 

3. Process-centered 

A fundamental part of TQM is a focus on process thinking. A process is a series of steps that take inputs from suppliers (internal or external) and transforms them into outputs that are delivered to customers (again, either internal or external). The steps required to carry out the process are defined, and performance measures are continuously monitored in order to detect unexpected variation. 

4. Integrated system 

Although an organization may consist of many different functional specialties often organized into vertically structured departments, it is the horizontal processes interconnecting these functions that are the focus of TQM. 
  • Micro-processes add up to larger processes, and all processes aggregate into the business processes required for defining and implementing strategy. Everyone must understand the vision, mission, and guiding principles as well as the quality policies, objectives, and critical processes of the organization. Business performance must be monitored and communicated continuously. 
  • An integrated business system may be modeled after the Baldrige National Quality Program criteria and/or incorporate the ISO 9000 standards. Every organization has a unique work culture, and it is virtually impossible to achieve excellence in its products and services unless a good quality culture has been fostered. Thus, an integrated system connects business improvement elements in an attempt to continually improve and exceed the expectations of customers, employees, and other stakeholders. 

5. Strategic and systematic approach 

A critical part of the management of quality is the strategic and systematic approach to achieving an organization’s vision, mission, and goals. This process, called strategic planning or strategic management, includes the formulation of a strategic plan that integrates quality as a core component. 

6. Continual improvement 

A major thrust of TQM is continual process improvement. Continual 
improvement drives an organization to be both analytical and creative in finding ways to become more competitive and more effective at meeting stakeholder expectations. 

7. Fact-based decision making 

In order to know how well an organization is performing, data on performance measures are necessary. TQM requires that an organization continually collect and analyze data in order to improve decision making accuracy, achieve consensus, and allow prediction based on past history. 

8. Communications 

During times of organizational change, as well as part of day-to-day operation, effective communications plays a large part in maintaining morale and in motivating employees at all levels. Communications involve strategies, method, and timeliness. 

Leadership’ and ‘Engagement of People’ as principles of quality management in education sector:

According to the idea of transformational leadership , an effective leader is a person who does the following: 
  1. Creates an inspiring vision of the future. 
  2. Motivates and inspires people to engage with that vision. 
  3. Manages delivery of the vision. 
  4. Coaches and builds a team, so that it is more effective at achieving the vision. 
Leadership brings together the skills needed to do these things. We'll look at each element in more detail. 
ISO 9001 is underpinned by the 8 Principles of Quality Management. They’ve been the guiding principles for the most popular quality standard; ISO 9001. But they’re also useful resources for any management professionals who want to implement or improve their existing quality management programme. 

PRINCIPLE 1: CUSTOMER FOCUS 

Just as you’d expect, customer focus is the first principle: just where it should be. It covers both customer needs and customer service. It stresses that a business should understand their customers, what they need and when, whilst trying to meet, but preferably exceed customers’ expectations. As a result, customer loyalty increases, revenue rises and waste reduces as the businesses ability to spot new customer opportunities and satisfy them improves. More effective processes result in improved customer satisfaction. 

PRINCIPLE 2: LEADERSHIP 

Without clear and strong leadership, a business flounders. Principle 2, is concerned with the direction of the organisation. The business should have clear goals & objectives, and its employees actively involved in achieving those targets. The benefits are better employee engagement and increased motivation to satisfy customer needs. Research shows, if employees are kept ‘in the loop’ and understand the business vision they’ll be more productive. This principle seeks to rectify employees complaints about ‘lack of communication’. 

PRINCIPLE 3: PEOPLE INVOLVEMENT 

An organisation is nothing without its staff whether part-time, full-time in house or outsourced. It’s their abilities that maximised to achieve business success. 7 Employee motivation and increased innovation and the benefits here. When people feel valued, they’ll work to their maximum potential and contribute ideas. Principle 3 emphasises the importance of making employees responsible and accountable for their actions. 

{================} 

Q. 3 Enlist different sources of resistance during change. Explain different techniques to manage resistance during change management process in an educational organization. 

Answer: 

Individual sources of resistance towards a change exist in the basic human tenets or characteristics and are influenced by the differences in perception, personal background, needs or personality-related differences. It is important to understand those triggering factors or issues which refrain individuals from endorsing change or extending their support and cooperation towards any change initiatives at an organizational level. Criticizing the individuals or the teams for not being supportive in the stages of transition or compelling them cannot be an effective solution for implementing change smoothly or in a hassle free manner. 

The resistance towards change at an individual level can be due to various reasons:  

  • How satisfied they are with the existing state of affairs 
  • Whether they appreciate the overall end product of change and it’s outcome on them.
  • How much practical or realistic the change is 
  • What will be the possible cost change on the individual in terms of potential risks involved, pressure to develop new competencies and disruptions 
The following factors explain why individuals may pose resistance towards change: 

Habits: 

We individuals are influenced by our habits in our ways of working and accept or reject a change depending upon the effect which a change may have on the existing habits of the individuals. For example, change in the office location 8 might be subjected to resistance from the individuals as this might compel them to change their existing life routine and create a lot of difficulties in adjustment or coping with the schedule. The individuals might have to drive a longer way for reaching their office, or start early from home for reaching their office in time, etc.  

Lack of Acceptability or Tolerance for the Change: 

Some individuals endorse change and welcome a change initiative happily while few individuals fear the impact of change. Over a period of time change fatigue also builds up. 

Fear of a Negative Impact Economically or on the Income: 

During the process of organizational restructuring or introduction of organization-wide change as a strategic move on the part of the management, several inhibitions, and fear rule the thought process of the individuals. Fear of possible loss of a job as a result of change or a change in their income structure or may be a change in their work hours could be one amongst the possible reasons. 

Fear of the Unseen and Unknown Future: 

Individuals develop inertia towards the change due to the fear of unknown or uncertainties in the future. This can be tackled through effective communication with the participants of change and making people aware of the positives of change and the course of action which individuals are expected to follow to cope with the changing requirements successfully. 

Fear of Losing Something Really Valuable: 

Any form of threat to personal security or financial security or threat to the health of the individuals may lead to fear of losing something precious as a result of the implementation of change. 

Selective Processing of Information: 

It can be considered as a filtering process in which the individuals perceive or make judgments by gathering selective information which is greatly influenced by their personal background, attitude, personal biases or prejudices, etc. If an individual maintains a negative attitude towards any kind of change, then they are having a usual tendency of looking at the negativities associated with the change and involve all the positive aspects of it. 
A Rigid Belief that change cannot bring about any facilitating change in the organization and it only involves the pain and threats to the individuals. 
Now, we will look into the organizational factors which result in resistance to change. 

Resistance Due to the Structural Rigidities or Limitations: 

Structural resistance is a characteristic feature of bureaucracies, which focus more on stability, control, set methodologies or routine.
Ignoring all the interconnected factors which require change or lack of clarity in understanding the ground realities. 

Inertia from the Groups: 

Groups may resist change because just like individuals, groups equally follow set behavioural patterns, norms or culture and as a result of change the groups might have to change their existing ways of conduct or behaviour.
Possible threats to Power, Resources or Expertise can also result in resistance towards an organization level change. Any kind of devolution of power or transfer of resources from some agency or group to some other agency or a group will definitely lead to a feeling of fear or inertia towards a change initiative. 
In the end, it can be concluded that any kind of change will surely involve heavy resistance at the individual as well as organizational level. But through effective communication during all stages and consulting, desirable outcomes can be ensured by breaking all the possible barriers or resistances towards a change. What is more important is identifying the main source of resistance and accordingly developing action plans for dealing with it. Successful change in an organization will require strong commitment and involvement on the part of the top management, focused and an integrated approach, strong and a stable leadership, effective and open communication from the internal change agent for making people sensitive and more aware of the realities and the ultimate need for change. For minimizing the resistance towards the change employee participation and involvement in the overall process plays a crucial role in building acceptability and seeking the cooperation of 10 the employees towards the change. Hence proper planning, coordinated approach and complete involvement of all the stakeholders, play a decisive role in implementing strategic decisions and determining the success of change. 

{================} 

Q. 4 Differentiate between formative and summative assessment with relevant examples from education sector. What are the possible sources for assessment of students? 

Answer: 

Definition of formative and summative assessment 

The first difference is of course their definition. 
Formative assessment is used to monitor student’s learning to provide ongoing feedback that can be used by instructors or teachers to improve their teaching and by students to improve their learning. 
Summative assessment, however, is used to evaluate student’s learning at the end of an instructional unit by comparing it against some standard or benchmark. You can tell from their definitions that those two evaluation strategies are not meant to evaluate in the same way. So let’s take a look at the biggest differences between them. 

Differences between formative and summative assessments 

Difference 1 

The first big difference is when the assessment takes place in a student’s learning process. As the definition already gave away, formative assessment is an ongoing activity. The evaluation takes place during the learning process. Not just one time, but several times. A summative evaluation takes place at a complete other time. Not during the process, but after it. The evaluation takes place after a course or unit’s completion. 

Difference 2 

There’s also a big difference between the assessment strategies in getting the right information of the student’s learning. With formative assessments you try to figure out whether a student’s doing well or needs help by monitoring the learning process. When you use summative assessments, you assign grades. The grades tell you whether the student achieved the learning goal or not. 

Difference 3 

The purposes of both assessments lie miles apart. For formative assessment, the purpose is to improve student’s learning. In order to do this you need to be able to give meaningful feedback. Check out this post about feedback. For summative assessment, the purpose is to evaluate student’s achievements. So do you want your students to be the best at something, or do you want your students to transcend themselves each time over and over again? 

Difference 4 

Remember when I said that with formative assessment the evaluation takes place several times during the learning process en with summative assessment at the end of a chapter or course? This explains also the size of the evaluation packages. Formative assessment includes little content areas. For example: 3 formative evaluations of 1 chapter. Summative assessment includes complete chapters or content areas. For example: just 1 evaluation at the end of a chapter. The lesson material package is much larger now. 

Difference 5 

The last difference you may already have guessed. Formative assessment considers evaluation as a process. This way, the teacher can see a student grow and steer the student in an upwards direction. With summative assessment it’s harder for you to steer the student in the right direction. The evaluation is already done. That’s why summative assessments or evaluations are considered to be more of a “product”. 

Examples of formative assessments 

Formative assessments can be classroom polls, exit tickets, early feedback, and so on. But you can make them more fun too. Take a look at these three examples. 
  1. In response to a question or topic inquiry, students write down 3 different summaries. 10-15 words long, 30-50 words long and 75-100 words long. 
  2. The 3-2-1 countdown exercise: Give your students cards to write on, or they can respond orally. Students have to respond to three separate statements: 3 things you didn’t know before, 2 things that surprised you about this topic and 1 thing you want to start doing with what you’ve learned. 
  3. One minute papers are usually done at the end of the lesson. Students answer a brief question in writing. The question typically centers around the main point of the course, most surprising concept, most confusing area of the topic and what question from the topic might appear on the next test. 

Examples of summative assessments 

Most of you have been using summative assessments whole their teaching careers. And that’s normal. Education is a slow learner and giving students grades is the easier thing to do. Examples of summative assessments are midterm exams, end-of-unit or –chapter tests, final projects or papers, district benchmark and scores used for accountability for schools and students. So, that was it for this post. I hope you now know the differences and know which assessment strategy you are going to use in your teaching. If you want to know more about implementing formative assessment you should really take a look at this interview of a school without grades and this post about the building blocks of formative assessment. 

{================} 

Q. 5 Explain Learning Management system. Also discuss different features of MOODLE (a Learning Management System). 

Answer: 

A learning management system (LMS) is a software application for the administration, documentation, tracking, reporting and delivery of educational courses or training programs. Learning management system is a concept emerging directly from the eLearning, even though there were other tools, informatics or not which have encouraged distance education Distance Education Learning Environments Survey. The first introduction of LMS is in the late of 1990s They help the instructor deliver material to the students, administer tests and other assignments, track student progress, and manage record-keeping. LMSs are focused on online learning delivery but support a range of uses, acting as a platform for fully online courses, as well as several hybrid forms, such as blended learning and flipped classrooms. LMSs can be complemented by other learning technologies such as a training management system to manage instructor-led training or a Learning Record Store to store and track learning data. An LMS delivers and manages instructional content, and typically handles student registration, online course administration, and tracking, and assessment of student work.[3] Some LMSs help identify progress towards learning or training goals.[4] Most LMSs are web-based, to facilitate access. LMSs are often used by regulated industries (e.g. financial services and biopharma) for compliance training. Some LMS providers include "performance management systems", which encompass employee appraisals, competency management, skills-gap analysis, succession planning, and multi-rater assessments (i.e., 360 degree reviews). Some systems support competency-based learning. Though there are a wide variety of terms for digital aids or platforms for education, such as "course management systems", "virtual or managed learning platforms or systems", or "computer-based learning environment", the term "learning management system" has become the ubiquitous term for products that help administer or deliver part or all of a course. 

Technical aspects 

Most LMSs are web-based. There are a variety of integration strategies for embedding content into LMSs, including AICC, SCORM (Sharable Content Object Reference Model) and LTI (Learning Tools Interoperability). LMSs were originally designed to be locally hosted onpremise, where the organization purchases a license to a version of the software, and installs it on their own servers and network. Many LMSs are also offered as SaaS (software as a service), with hosting provided by the vendors. Through LMS, teachers may create and integrate course materials, articulate learning goals, align content and assessments, track studying progress, and create customized test for students. LMS allows the communication of learning objectives, and organize learning timelines. LMS leverage is that it delivers learning content and tools straight to learners, and it can also reach marginalized groups through special settings . Such systems have built in customizable features including assessment and tracking. Thus, learners can see in real time their progress and instructors can monitor and communicate the effectiveness of learning. Such systems have built in customizable features including assessment and tracking. Thus, learners can see in real time their progress and instructors can monitor and communicate the effectiveness of learning. One of the most important features of LMS is trying to create a streamline communication between learners and instructors. Such systems, besides facilitating online learning, tracking learning progress, providing digital learning tools, manage communication, and maybe selling content, may be used to provide different communication features. 

Learning management system Features 

Managing courses, users, roles, instructors: 

LMS may be used to create professional structured course content. The teacher can add, text, images, tables, links and text formatting, interactive tests, slideshows, video, audio etc. LMS can support a wide variety of content formats. Moreover, it can offer the opportunity of different levels of users, like teachers, students, visitors and editors (hierarchies). It helps to control which content student can access, track studying progress and engage student 15 with contact tools. Teachers can manage, student interface, course and module, selfenrolment, user reporting and import students to their online classes. It is therefore relatively easy to adapt a course so that it is followed by an LMS as long as the institution providing it has the necessary infrastructure, particularly at the IT level. In addition, the teacher concerned must be able to manage his course through the LMS. This is not necessarily the case in light of current research suggesting that e-learning leads to increased workload for teachers. 

Online assessment, track students’ attendance: 

LMS can enable teachers to create customized tests for students, accessible and submitted online. Platforms allows different multiple question types like, one/multi-line answer, multiple choice answer, drag-and- drop order, essay, true or false/yes or no, fill in the gaps, agreement scale, offline tasks. Through Attendance Manager, teachers view attendance and record whether each student attended, arrived late, or missed classes and events. This allows a better evaluation of the students because it takes into account the overall monitoring of the courses by the student. 

User feedback: 

Students' exchange of feedback both with teachers and their peers is possible through LMS. Teachers may create discussion groups to allow students feedback and increase the interaction in course. Students’ feedback is an instrument which help teachers to improve their work, identify what to add or remove from their courses, where students feel more comfortable, what makes them be more included. This is all the more important as the history of events is kept by the LMS, students can therefore easily find discussions, comments from the teacher or update his course through the LMS. It also allows access at anytime and anywhere to the documents they contain. Students can see the changes made to the courses they follow as they are done. 

{================}